USE
OF THE POLLEN AND PLANT FOSSILS FOR WETLAND CREATION, RESTORATION
AND ENHANCEMENT
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Ben A. LePage
URS Corporation
335 Commerce Drive, Suite 300
Fort Washington, PA, 19034
Ben_LePage@urscorp.com
|
|
|
The process of restoring
and creating wetlands varies according to location, type and
ecological functions that are being enhanced or created. Wetland
design, and ultimately, regulatory approval is concerned with
aspects such as site selection, hydrology, soil amendments,
ecological functions and values, plant selection and long-term
monitoring and management. While each of these elements is
essential for the ultimate success of the wetland project,
the issue of proper plant selection may not have been fully
assessed. The selection of the plants that comprise the landscape
palate for restoration and creation projects is often based
on an inventory of the plants growing locally or from a reference
wetland. However, the composition of the flora in most regions
of the US, especially near urban centers, has been significantly
impacted by human activities and the selected plant palate
may not be truly representative of indigenous vegetation.
Moreover, continued global warming is likely to significantly
impact wetlands, especially those that are tidally influenced.
The use of palynology and plant macrofossil analysis provides
a means to reconstruct the composition of the vegetative community
prior to human intervention, and provides a record of vegetation
change that can be correlated with climatic and environmental
change. The use of pollen and macrofossil data coupled with
historic hydrogeomorphic characteristics may help provide
guidance for plant selection, hydrology and restoration. The
site’s historical floristic together with the hydrogeomorphic
record may aid project success by considering the historic
vegetation that was adapted to the regional conditions, past
climatic and environmental change, and increased ecological
function through potential increased species diversity.
|
| |
AVOIDING
THE MUD: SEEKING CERTAINTY POST-RAPANOS
|
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Marina Liacouras Phillips
Kaufman & Canoles
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
(757) 624-3279
|
| |
| The
question is "what the regulated community may need to litigate
in the wetlands arena post-Rapanos?" The answer is "just about
everything." The focus of the regulated community, in this context
primarily landowners and developers, is upon the design and
completion of a project. When a wetlands permit is required
to attain that goal, it takes a place as one of the action items
on the project management list. Not only does litigation not
have a place on that list, but it is truly at odds with the
ultimate goal of project completion. Ironically, the state of
the current process for identification of jurisdictional wetlands
is so murky that at this point, the regulated community is being
forced to the courts for clarification. This presentation will
highlight the regulatory community's major questions in the
search for regulatory clarity, both addressing issues that have
been heard in the courts and anticipating issues that will arise
in the future. |
| |
VIRGINIA'S
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION EXPERIENCE
|
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Steve Martin
Environmental Scientist
Norfolk District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
803 Front Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
(757) 201-7787
|
| |
|
Virginia
has a well-developed compensatory mitigation program. While permittee-responsible mitigation makes up most of the compensatory
mitigation in Virginia (52% in 2005), third party mitigation
(mitigation banks and in-lieu fee programs) is an important
form of compensatory mitigation. In 2005, mitigation banks
provided 37% and In-lieu fee made up 11% of all compensatory
mitigation in Virginia.
|
| |
| In
2005, permittee-responsible mitigation was used equally often
to compensate for impacts to non-tidal wetlands and streams.
Banks and ILF programs provided compensation primarily for impacts
to non-tidal wetlands (91% and 71% respectively) and secondarily
compensation for stream impacts (9% and 24% respectively). |
| |
| Currently,
Virginia has more than 40 operational mitigation banks and 2
ILF programs. Most banks are single site banks, but the number
of umbrella mitigation banks is growing.
Most of Virginia’s mitigation banks are commercial banks. |
| |
| Third
party mitigation (banks & ILF program) service areas are
watershed-based. The price of mitigation ranges from a low of
$12-16,000/acre (non-tidal wetland in eastern Virginia) to a
high of $523,000/acre (tidal mitigation). |
| |
| Norfolk
District Corps, Virginia DEQ along with other federal and state
agencies are working to facilitate bank review and approval
and to improve performance of all forms of compensatory mitigation.
To that end, we have developed a template MBI and real
estate and escrow agreements, a unified stream assessment methodology,
and are finalizing mitigation site selection guidelines.
We have implemented an online mitigation bank information
system to provide better information to the public on mitigation
banking. |
| |
ASSESSMENT
OF WETLAND RESERVE PROGRAM RESTORATION EFFORTS AS MEASURED
BY OCCUPANCY OF AMPHIBIAN METAMORPHS
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Doreen C. Mengel*
University of Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
302 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building
Department of Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-7240
(660) 247-1686; dcmgf7@mizzou.edu
and
David L. Galat
U. S. Geological Survey
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO
|
| |
| The goal of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service’s Wetland Reserve Program
(WRP) is “to achieve the greatest wetland functions and values,
along with optimum wildlife habitat, on every acre enrolled
in the program.” A key
unanswered question is to what extent is this goal being achieved?
Approximately 125 WRP tracts are located within the Lower Grand
River basin, north central Missouri. We identified three management
strategies applied to these WRP tracts over time: walkaways,
maximize hydrology, and naturalistic; the latter emphasizing
restoring process as well as structure.
Amphibians enable quantifying the WRP goal due to their
life history requirements and explicit incorporation of their
habitat needs into WRP plans.
Research objectives are to determine (1) if relative
species richness of amphibians varies between the three management
strategies, and (2) proportion of area occupied by selected
metamorphic amphibian species whose life history requirements
span the continuum from ephemeral to permanent wetland conditions.
Assessing wetland restoration efforts by linking amphibian habitat
requirements to the role WRP tracts play in meeting these needs
provides an ecological basis to evaluate the success of WRP
restoration efforts. Results
will assist making informed decisions regarding future management
directions and allocation of limited resources. |
| |
GIS-BASED
LANDSCAPE-LEVEL HYDROGEOMORPHIC WETLAND CLASSIFICATION
|
|
|
|
Presenters*/Authors:
David H. Merkey, PhD., PWS
Parsons, Inc.
1133 Fifteenth Street, NW, 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
David.Merkey@parsons.com
|
| |
|
Many of the wetland classification
and assessment methods currently available do not provide
resource managers with the information necessary to adequately
protect and manage wetland habitats at the regional or landscape
level. This failure stems, in part, from the fact that “wetland-by-wetland”
methods call for the collection of detailed, time-consuming,
and expensive-to-collect site-level data for individual wetlands,
requiring resources that management agencies typically lack.
A new geographic information system (GIS)-based wetland classification
tool that would allow resource managers to assess the potential
characteristics and functions of wetlands across large areas
quickly and efficiently is proposed. Portions of the Hydrogeomorphic
wetland classification method (HGM) have been incorporated
to summarize and compare site-level wetland characteristics
that can be adapted for regional planning purposes. Landscape-level
data is used in the GIS to assign HGM classes and predict
wetland characteristics. In order to assign HGM classes to
wetlands, polygons (e.g., National Wetland Inventory) are
first converted to a raster format. Using spatial relationships
and topographic and hydrologic data, individual grid cells
are classified into HGM categories based on the following
characteristics of each cell: (1) the association with surface
water bodies (Lacustrine and Riverine), and (2) the presence
of enclosed contours within the wetland (Depressional), and
(3) the presence/absence of slope (Slope vs. Flat). Once all
individual grid cells are appropriately classified, potential
hydrologic functions (e.g., flooding retention, groundwater
discharge) can be related, allowing managers to better understand
the resources in their jurisdiction.
|
| |
HOWARD'S
BRANCH STREAM AND WETLANDS RESTORATION
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Keith Underwood* and Erik Michelsen*
Underwood & Associates
1753 Ebling Trail
Annapolis, MD 21401
(410) 849-3211
|
|
| This wetland
and stream enhancement project was designed to support the reintroduction
of an Atlantic white cedar, (Chamaecyparis thyoides (L.)
B.S.P.) wetland by creating a seepage wetland supporting an
Atlantic white cedar community in a degraded stream valley previously
impounded for use as a drinking water reservoir. A series
of cobble weirs and a network of sand berms was placed over
a dry lakebed to mimic the hydrology found in natural Atlantic
white cedar sites. In April 2001 construction of the Howard’s
Branch project was completed with the planting of 1,000 Anne
Arundel County, Maryland-endemic Atlantic white cedar. Plants
were propagated from the 10 remaining stands of the species
on the western coastal plain of Maryland. The modifications
necessary to establish the sand seepage hydrology suitable for
the establishment of seepage wetlands result in a series of
well vegetated pools, sand seepage beds replete with above and
below-ground biomass, and flow paths through low areas dominated
by native wetland plants. The physical effect of the pools
and their many plant stems is to reduce water velocity and facilitate
removal of suspended particles and their associated nutrients
and/or contaminants. Uptake and adsorption of nutrients
and contaminants by the plant stems in the pools yields additional
benefits. The sand seepage bed supports organisms and
processes which remove nutrients and contaminants as they pass
through the sand bed. The
six (6) year old project has been successful and serves as inspiration
for similar projects and related applications. |
| |
IMPORTANCE
OF DISTURBANCE REGIMES IN WETLAND SYSTEMS, UPSTREAM AND COASTAL
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Beth Middleton
National Wetlands Research Center
U.S. Geological Survey
700 Cajundome Boulevard
Lafayette, LA 70506
beth_middleton@usgs.gov
|
| |
| The
large-scale disturbances associated with flood pulsing, high
wind, and fire are a part of the dynamics of natural ecosystems.
At the same time, reengineering to protect the world's coastal
wetlands and inland floodplains from these disturbances has
altered the disturbance regime of these reengineered landscapes.
Changes in hydrology on floodplains are especially problematic
for plants species because regeneration often depends on flood
pulsing; the long-term decline in native biodiversity on floodplains
may be due mostly to these hydrologic changes. Engineering practices
that change the hydrologic conditions on floodplains include
the straightening and deepening of river channels, levee protection,
and the release of water from dams during times that a damaging
to plant growth and regeneration. Attempts to address the altered
conditions in reengineered coastal and riverine wetlands usually
are not conceptualized on a landscape level. As an example,
the creation of small impoundments or diversions on the floodplain
can restore hydrologic function. These actions, however, do
not address the problems associated with the lack of a landscape-driven
flood pulses from river flooding. Hurricanes are another example
of large-scale disturbance whose importance in shaping coastal
forests is not widely appreciated. Hurricanes expose the trees
to wind, tidal surge, and sediment, and may push coastal forests
towards dominance by wind-tolerant species. Along the Pearl
River, for example, Taxodium distichum survived better than
other species after Hurricane Katrina, and this species regenerated
in forest openings created by the toppling of less tolerant
tree species. A better appreciation of the importance of natural
disturbance in wetland function is critical for the development
of new approaches for wetland restoration and management |
| |
IBIS
AND WETLAND QUALITY STANDARDS: USING EMPIRICAL DATA TO DEFINE
TIERED AQUATIC LIFE USES IN PENNSYLVANIA WETLANDS
|
| |
|
Presenters*/Authors:
S. J. Miller*, D.H. Wardrop, and R.P. Brooks
Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center
302 Walker Building
University Park, PA 16802
(814) 863-2567; Fax: (814) 863-7193
sjm20@psu.edu; dhw110@psu.edu; rpb2@psu.edu
|
|
|
The
Cooperative Wetlands Center at Penn State University has constructed
a plant-based index of biological integrity (IBI) for headwater
complex wetlands (floodplain, slope, and riparian depressions)
in the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province of central
Pennsylvania. The IBI is comprised of eight metrics that show
a specific and predictable response along a gradient of anthropogenic
disturbance. The index was created using 40 reference sites
and validated using a subset of 47 sites assessed as part
of the Juniata Wetland Monitoring Project. While IBIs are
primarily used for condition assessment, an overarching goal
of the assessment process is the use of empirical data to
inform water quality standards for wetlands (i.e., wetland
quality standards) so that they can be promulgated and codified.
Although most monitoring and assessment programs have designated
a single aquatic life use for wetlands, more recent efforts
have attempted to use biological information to tier designated
aquatic life uses to more precisely categorize condition,
as well as measure attainment of goals. We used data from
our IBI to designate tiers of condition for headwater complex
wetlands in central Pennsylvania. To determine breakpoints
for our tiers, we compared three different methods: classification
and regression tree (CART), mathematical quadrisection, and
graphically, using natural data breaks. Each tier was then
qualitatively described based on observations of the plant
community at our sites. The tiers also indicate thresholds
for preservation and restoration, as well as help elucidate
stressors that can be mitigated through wetland BMPs to improve
condition.
|
|
NEW
FRONTIERS IN COASTAL PLAIN HEADWATER STREAM RESTORATION IN
NORTH CAROLINA
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Tracy Morris*, Jessica Kemp*, and Jim Halley
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
(919) 715-0476
|
|
| The North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) implements stream and wetland
restoration projects throughout the State for compensatory mitigation.
The purpose of the EEP is to enhance and restore ecological
functions of streams and wetlands. In the Coastal Plain, undisturbed
headwater streams provide critical hydrologic, biogeochemical
and biological functions. However,
in most Coastal Plain areas these headwater systems have been
artificially drained to promote agriculture.
In the past, these headwater stream systems were not
considered as candidates for stream restoration due to the absence
of a defined streambed and stream bank. Realizing the importance of headwater streams
and the limitations on headwater stream restoration, an information
paper was developed by the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District. The details set forth in the information paper enabled
EEP to pursue restoration of headwater stream valleys in the
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain Ecoregion. The Unnamed Tributary to Pembroke Creek project,
located in the Pasquotank River Basin, is one of the first EEP
restoration projects to incorporate the methods presented in
the information paper. The
proposed project will restore approximately 4,400 linear feet
of headwater stream valley. The restoration design addresses natural valley
shape, hydrology, wildlife habitat, site constraints, and the
establishment of the appropriate plant community types based
on reference conditions. Three
reference sites, including one adjacent to the restoration area,
were used to guide plant selection and the design of the restored
headwater stream. Restoration efforts will begin summer 2007
and the site will be monitored for a minimum of five years. |
| |
SURVEY
METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING GEOGRAPHICALLY ISOLATED WETLANDS
MAP ACCURACY
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Breda Munoz*
Research Statistician
RTI International Research
Triangle Park, NC
breda@rti.org
Virginia M. Lesser
Associate Professor
SRC Director
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR
lesser@science.oregonstate.edu
John Dorney
Supervisor, Wetlands Program Development Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh, NC
john.dorney@ncmail.net
and
Frank Obusek
Geospatial Imaging Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Swannanoa, NC
frank.obusek@ncmail.net
|
|
| Wetlands
provide significant environmental benefits such as assimilation
of pollutants, flood water storage, water recharge and fish
and wildlife habitat. Geographically isolated wetlands (GIW)
can provide the same benefits as wetlands in general, and are
particularly vulnerable to losses from urbanization and agriculture
because they are geographically isolated and have varying amounts
of regulatory protection. Currently, there is not a dependable
and cost-effective method to generate an accurate GIW map without
sending a field scientist to perform surveys or requiring image
technicians to perform digitalization of aerial photography.
By using statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates one
can evaluate the quality of the information contained in GIW
maps. Accuracy rates are used to describe the misclassification
errors of the maps. A probability sampling survey methodology
that balances statistical considerations, expert opinion and
operational considerations is proposed for assessing the accuracy
of GIW maps. The proposed sampling design is based on a stratified
multi-stage sampling design that addresses sampling size requirements
for the different strata and types of GIWs.
The sampling design also recognizes the need for spatial
coverage while minimizing operational efforts. Expressions for
design-based accuracy estimates and an estimate of the number
of GIWs, as well as their corresponding variances are also provided. |
|
|
| A
simulation exercise is used to illustrate the proposed sampling
methodology. A GIW map for two eastern North Carolina counties
(Robeson and Columbus), created using historical data, was used
as the sampling frame. The GIW map was created from a combination
of satellite imagery, classification tools to process the imagery
and auxiliary information. The sampling methodology was used
to randomly select sites from this GIW map. An updated GIW map
for the same counties showing exact locations of GIW was used
to provide “ground-truth” observations from wetland delineations
approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Survey based accuracy
estimates were calculated by comparing site classification differences,
obtained by using both the original and updated GIW maps. |
| |
SIGNIFICANT
CONFUSION: HOW SHOULD JUSTICE KENNEDY'S "SIGNIFICANT NEXUS"
TEST BE APPLIED TO PROTECT WATERS AND ARE COURTS AND THE AGENCIES
APPLYING IT CORRECTLY?
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Jim Murphy
Wetlands and Water Resources Counsel
National Wildlife Federation
58 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802) 229-0650; Fax: (802) 229-4532
jmurphy@nwf.org
|
| |
| Until 2001, there
was little question that almost all waters were protected by
the Clean Water Act. However, after two confounding and fractured
Supreme Court decisions (SWANCC 2001 and Rapanos
2006), there is now tremendous confusion over what waters the
Act covers. There is a growing legal consensus after the 2006
Rapanos decision that for the Act to apply to certain
wetlands (and perhaps tributaries and other waters as well),
there must be a case-by-case showing of a "significant nexus"
between such waters and larger waters more traditionally defined
as navigable. Of course, that conclusion raises far more questions
than it answers. What is a "significant nexus"? To which waters
does the test apply? What factors are relevant in determining
such a nexus? Who bears the burden of showing such a nexus?
Case law since Rapanos has, not surprisingly, been scattershot
in answering these questions. Moreover, recent agency guidance
on Rapanos has also failed to produce much clarity. This
presentation will look to the Rapanos decision itself,
recent case law, and the agency guidance in attempting to answer
the tough questions regarding the "significant nexus" test.
It will also examine whether courts and the agencies are properly
applying test. And it will discuss whether this test provides
a workable framework for protecting water resources at all. |
| |
DIGITAL
WETLANDS: BRINGING THE FIELD TO THE OFFICE
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Tim Palmer
GIS Manager
Maryland Environmental Service
7001 Aviation Boulevard, 2nd Floor
Glen Burnie, MD 21061
(410) 850-5816; Fax: (410) 850-5315
TPALM@menv.com
|
|
|
The transition from paper to computer does not always come
easy. Historic data
and resident knowledge are a legacy unrivaled by today’s technology. What to do with all of the “necessary” paper
documentation being left behind, or in some cases, disintegrating? What about the first generation databases that
are obsolete, or soon will be?
What happens after the last person who retires and
takes all of the knowledge and information needed for a public
hearing next month?
|
| |
| The Maryland Department of the Environment, Wetlands and Waterways
Program staff are answering those questions with the help of
digital technology and GIS (Geographic Information Systems). Digital archival of irreplaceable, legally binding tidal wetlands
maps, sophisticated GIS capture of wetlands impact information
and instant access to digital wetlands permitting data is just
the start. |
| |
| GIS has become a corner stone of the information technology
world. The ability to
analyze years of data trends, track non-point source pollution,
or even just check on the status of a permit is accessible with
the push of a button or the click of the mouse.
But, careful construction, creative foresight and internal
communication are imperative to its success and acceptance. |
| |
REMOTE
SENSING METHODS FOR MAPPING SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA MARSH DIEBACK
ONSET AND PROGRESSION ON THE GULF AND ATLANTIC COASTS
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Elijah Ramsey III*
U.S. Geological Survey
700 Cajundome Boulevard
Lafayette, LA 70506
elijah_ramsey@usgs.gov
Charles Bachmann
Naval Research Laboratory
Remote Sensing Division
Coastal & Ocean Remote Sensing Branch
Coastal Science & Interpretation Section, Code 7232 Washington,
D.C. 20375
Robert Christian
East Carolina University
Department of Biology
Greenville, NC 27858
|
Amina Rangoonwala
AIP World Services, Inc.
Marcos Montes, Robert Fusina, and Wei Chen
Naval Research Laboratory
Remote Sensing Division
Coastal & Ocean Remote Sensing Branch Coastal Experiments
Section, Code 7231 Washington, D.C. 20375
Amanda Marsh
East Carolina University
Department of Biology
Greenville, NC 27858
|
|
| We developed
remote sensing techniques to map the occurrence of marsh dieback
(Spartina alterniflora)
at the leaf and canopy reflectance scales. |
|
| First, we determined
live leaf indicators of marsh impact onset and progression along
transects spanning dieback sites in coastal Louisiana.
Results showed that the near infrared (nir)/red ratio
followed blue and red while the nir/green ratio mimicked the
green and red edge reflectance trends.
The nir/green transect trends best indicated early onset
and progression and adequately portrayed later stages of dieback.
|
|
| Second, we obtained
canopy reflectance spectra (~20 m ground resolution) over the
leaf analyses transects and at additional non-occupied impact
sites. The spectra were analyzed at hyperspectral (e.g., EO1
Hyperion) and broadband spectral (EO1 Advanced Land Imager the
Landsat TM) scales. Both
the hyperspectral and broadband spectral indicators identified
(1) healthy marsh, (2) live marsh impacted by dieback, and (3)
dead marsh, and both provided discrimination of dieback progression.
The hyperspectral data however offered enhanced discrimination
of dieback progression and dieback similarity between marsh
sites. |
|
| Third, we compared
our leaf and canopy spectral results associated with the marsh
dieback to spectral data collected during and within the two
years following a sudden Spartina
alterniflora dieback at the Virginia Coast Reserve Long-term
Ecological Research site (VCR LTER).
Louisiana Gulf coast results were also compared to leaf
and canopy spectral measurements of Spartina
alterniflora marsh occupying the barrier islands within
the VCR LTER. Leaf spectral measurements were carried-out similarly while canopy
measurements were collected via ground-based or airborne-based
hyperspectral collections versus helicopter-based as in the
Louisiana Gulf coast. |
|
USING
WEATHER RADAR TO ASSESS BIRD USE OF WETLAND RESERVE PROGRAM
WETLANDS IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Lori Randall*
U.S. Geological Survey
National Wetlands Research Center
700 Cajundome Boulevard
Lafayette, LA 70506
(337) 266-8665; Fax: (337) 266-8586
lori_randall@usgs.gov
Wylie Barrow
U.S. Geological Survey
National Wetlands Research Center
Lafayette, LA
and
Jeffrey Buler
IAP World Services, Inc
Wilmington, DE
|
| |
|
The nationwide network of Doppler weather radars
(Next Generation Radar or NEXRAD) detects a variety of bird
movements, and this radar technology holds enormous potential
for providing a broad-scale assessment of the migratory bird
use of restored Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) lands. As a
case study, we will use archived radar data to assess the
change in waterfowl use of WRP sites before (1996 - 1998)
and after (2004 - 2006) restoration for three NEXRAD sites
in California's Central Valley. We will estimate relative
bird density at sites by quantifying radar reflectivity at
the onset of daily bird movements that occur shortly after
sunset and near sunrise from November 1 through February 28.
These daily, synchronized movements are consistent with the
nocturnal feeding flights of wintering waterfowl. We expect
to find that seasonal mean radar reflectivity increased at
WRP sites after restoration. Our second objective is to aid
restoration planning by using an information-theoretic modeling
approach to assess the relative importance of site-specific
and landscape-scale habitat features (measured from 1km to
10km around sites) in explaining relative bird density at
WRP sites.
|
|
ARE
US FLOODED LANDS AND RESERVOIRS MAJOR SOURCES OF GREENHOUSE
GASES?
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Clark Row
P.O. Box 1037
Edgewood, MD 21040
(410) 538-3111
|
| |
| Numerous studies
have shown that flooded lands in the tropics, including reservoirs,
are major sources of greenhouse gases, particularly highly potent
methane. International
controversy has developed over whether GHG emissions from hydroelectric
projects partially or completely offset emission reductions
from not using fossil fuel.
Artic and boreal flooded lands have lower emissions.
|
|
| But how significant
are GHG emissions from flooded lands in the U.S?
Confident estimates have not been made; the data are
not available. But emission rates could affect future projects
justifications. |
|
| Environmental
conditions of most US reservoirs and other flooded lands suggest
they too generate substantial GHGs.
Emissions from US flooded lands have been measured only
at a few western reservoirs in dry climates and in the Great
Lake, all with relatively clean inflowing water No studies exist on flooded lands in the Midwest, Northeast, and
in the warm humid climate in the South and Southeast. Water flowing into most reservoirs in the eastern US also carries
fertilizer, organic materials, and other pollutants, and little
oxygen. These suggest higher levels of GHG emissions
than from natural rivers or lakes. |
|
|
The
presentation will discuss the biogeochemical pathways that
generate GHGs, and how they escape to the atmosphere.
It will discuss the numerous conditions that influence
the rates of emission, as will the problems of accurate measurement.
Finally it will outline the research needed to determine
the extent of emissions of GHGs from US flooded lands.
|
|
| *Clark Row, of Row Associates,
Edgewood, MD, is a consultant on climate change and vegetation
for US EPA, other agencies, nonprofits, and firms; former research
scientist and economist with the USDA Forest Service; and member
of the 2006 IPCC Greenhouse Gas National Inventory Guidelines
task group on wetlands. |
| |
MAPPING
HEADWATER STREAMS IN NORTH CAROLINA
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Periann Russell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
(919) 715-6835
|
|
|
Accurate map representation
of headwater stream locations, presence or absence, stream
origins and flow duration is critical to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), as well as to other public
and private entities, for use in 401 program development and
implementation. In 2004, NCDWQ, in cooperation with North
Carolina State University (NCSU) and North Carolina Department
of Transportation (NCDOT), began a stream mapping pilot project
to test the effectiveness and feasibility of modeling headwater
streams, origins and flow duration using stream data collected
in the field combined with landscape data generated from a
geographical information system (GIS).
To date, NCDWQ and NCSU have mapped over 600 intermittent
and perennial stream origins in 8 ecoregions across the state
for modeling purposes. Stream origin and flow duration determinations
were conducted using the NCDWQ Stream Identification Guidance
Methodology implemented in 1998. Preliminary results indicate
logistic regression produces the most effective model for
spatial application across EPA Level IV ecoregions. Additionally,
intermittent and perennial stream origin field data have provided
information regarding stream origin and flow duration characteristics
needed for assessment and analyses related to stream mitigation.
|
|
DIGITAL
DATA ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI) AND
CORRELATION WITH WETLAND DELINEATION PROCEDURES
|
| |
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Alexis E. Sandy*
Resource International, Ltd.
9560 Kings Charter Drive
Ashland, VA 23005
(804) 377-8369
John M. Galbraith
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
John H. Brooks III
Resource International, Ltd.
and
Pete Johns
New Kent Vineyards
|
| |
| On-site wetland
function attribution may be improved by off-site use of aerial
photography, satellite imagery, or maps. Off-site methods are
recommended by the 1989 interagency manual for use in areas
where "information on hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic
vegetation is known, or an inspection is not possible…”, but
are subject to errors. The
NWI serves as the definitive digital source for wetland resources
in the US. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility
of assigning landscape position codes to NWI polygons within
the Coastal Plain of Virginia through off-site correlation of
digital polygon environmental properties and field-validation.
Mean polygon pixel values for six environmental variables for
180 polygons representing six NWI landscape position classes
were applied to a cluster analysis. The hydric soil component
displayed the greatest variance in relation to position class
when compared to elevation and slope curvature, hydrography,
Cowardin classification, and vegetation. Flow
had an insignificant relationship to landscape position because
the random pixel selection often missed linear hydrologic features.
Vegetation data had poor resolution and high variability
within polygons. Three digital data sets that would improve
off-site wetland landscape position assignment include high-resolution
leaf-off aerial photography, soils and high vertical resolution
elevation data. This conclusion is reinforced by a case study
at the New Kent Vineyards demonstrating the use of high-resolution
leaf-off aerial photography, LiDAR topography, soils, and NWI
data to predict wetlands and landscape position for avoidance
and minimization of wetland impacts in compliance with Sections
404(b)1 of the Clean Water Act. |
|
EXAMINING
THE LANDSCAPE-LEVEL IMPACTS OF HURRICANES ON COASTAL WETLANDS:
A FOCUS ON LOUISIANA
|
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Kathryn E.L Smith*
Florida Integrated Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
600 4th Street South
Saint Petersburg, FL 33701
kelsmith@usgs.gov
Shea Penland
Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Sciences University
of New Orleans
2000 Lakeshore Drive
New Orleans, LA 70148
spenland@uno.edu
|
John A. Barras
National Wetland Research Center
Coastal Restoration Field Station
U.S. Geological Survey
P.O. Box 25098
Baton Rouge, LA 70894 john_barras@usgs.gov
and
John C. Brock
Florida Integrated Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
600 4th Street South
Saint Petersburg, FL 33701
jbrock@usgs.gov
|
|
| Coastal
wetlands provide valuable services to society and are currently
at risk due to the compounding effects of both anthropogenic
and natural disturbances. Coastal Louisiana is a prime example
of an ecosystem succumbing to the effects of large-scale landscape
modification and natural perturbations. Hurricanes impact the
northern Gulf of Mexico coast approximately every three years,
and there is evidence that these occurrences may be more frequent
and more intense in the future. Therefore, it is vital to know
the impact of severe storms on coastal wetlands in order to
properly evaluate management and restoration goals for such
an important resource. Numerous field studies have examined
the impact of hurricanes on marsh vegetation, but few studies
focused on landscape-level impacts using remote sensing and
spatial analysis techniques. The goals of this study were to
examine hurricane-initiated wetland loss and recovery, as well
as to draw comparisons between two severe storms. Wetland loss
and recovery will be presented for two hurricanes which have
impacted the eastern Louisiana coast: Hurricane Katrina (August
29th, 2005) and Hurricane Andrew (August 26th,
1992). Both hurricanes made landfall in the Mississippi deltaic
plain and were category four hurricanes prior to landfall with
similar wind speeds and barometric pressure. These similarities
present an opportunity to assess the response of wetlands to
hurricane forces, focusing on the spatial characteristics of
marsh loss and recovery. |
|
THE
RAPANOS INTERAGENCY GUIDANCE AND TOOLS TO SUPPORT CWA JURISDICTION
AFTER RAPANOS
|
|
|
|
Presenter/Author:
Peter Stokely
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Civil Enforcement
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (4110A)
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 564-1841
|
|
| After the Supreme
Court ruling in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United
States which discussed Clean Water Act jurisdiction and the
standards the court felt must be present to exert CWA jurisdiction,
the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers produced an interagency
guidance document entitled Memorandum Regarding Clean Water
Act (CWA) Jurisdiction Following the U.S Supreme Court’s Decision
in Rapanos v. United States and Carabell v. United Stats. The
purpose of the interagency guidance was to provide a focused
discussion of the types of considerations and standards agency
staff must consider when exerting CWA jurisdiction after Rapanos.
This presentation outlines geo-spatial tools, desktop analysis
methods, data sources and techniques for demonstrating the standards
for CWA jurisdiction discussed in the interagency guidance.
Specifically, the presentation discusses GIS mapping, aerial
photography interpretation, scientific literature, and modeling
as tools for demonstrating the standards of jurisdiction after
Rapanos. |
| |
CHALLENGES
IN ADDRESSING THE GAPS - FLORIDA'S APPROACH TO ISOLATED WETLANDS
AND STORMWATER
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Jim Stoutamire
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS 2500
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
(850) 245-8490
|
|
| Today, in 4/5s of the state, Florida operates an environmental resource
permit program. Previously,
the state operated a dredge and fill program addressing activities
in contiguous wetlands and four of five water management districts
operated a management and storage of surface water program. The latter program developed from earlier flood
control programs that evolved into a stormwater program addressing
the flow of water across the surface of the land, including
isolated wetlands. Thus, by the late 1980's, Florida had two water
regulatory programs and five different wetland delineation methodologies.
In the early 1990's, one wetland delineation method was
adopted and the regulatory programs were merged into the ERP
program, with isolated wetlands subject to "environmental"
criteria. However, Northwest
Florida was "grandfathered" and continued to operate
under the dredge and fill rules that excluded isolated wetlands,
even while using the new wetland delineation methodology, and
older stormwater rules. This
all changed in 2006 when the Legislature directed the state
and the Northwest Florida WMD to develop ERP rules for Northwest
Florida. Phase 1 of
those rules update the stormwater regulatory program and are
anticipated to be in place in the fall of 2007; Phase 2 rules
will, in 2008, implement a full ERP program including isolated
wetlands. In addition
to creating the ERP program Florida has linked that process
to authorizations to use state owned submerged lands, effectively
merging three review processes into one. |
| |
COMBINING
AUTOMATED AND MANUAL TECHNIQUES FOR ACCURATE NWI MAPPING
|
|
|
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Pamela Swint* and Kevin McGuckin
Conservation Management Institute
1900 Kraft Drive
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-3539; Fax: (540) 231-7019
www.cmiweb.org
|
|
|
Providing accurate and consistent
wetland maps is important for land managers who choose areas
to receive habitat protection and also for environmental researchers
conducting geospatial analysis. The Conservation Management Institute at Virginia
Tech has been working with the USFWS to create an “enhanced”
NWI dataset. This
“enhanced” information provides high resolution wetland data
along with additional attributes pertaining to landscape position
and change detection. We used a combination of manual and automated
techniques with high resolution imagery and ancillary data
to produce spatially accurate wetland maps for regions in
New York and Virginia. In the initial process, we used Feature Analyst
software to delineate water bodies and vegetative wetlands. Additional methods such as masking wetlands
by slope and hydric soils, and topographic map interpretation
were then used to produce a high-quality dataset.
Our method also includes providing attributes needed
for the Landscape Position, Landform, Water Flow Path, and
Waterbody Type (LLWW) process. This technique increased spatial
accuracy over previous methods and reduced overall processing
time. The results are less subjective and show more detail
than commonly used manual methods.
We also provide a quantitative assessment of the time
involved using this process compared to traditional heads-up
digitization.
|
|
THE
INFLUENCE OF STATE WETLAND REGULATIONS UPON THE SECTION 404
PROGRAM
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Ryan Taylor
Oregon State University
3147 Forest Hills Drive #4
Medford, OR 97504
(541) 779-5707
|
|
| This
ten-year study examines how selected outcomes of the Section
404 program during the turn of the 21st century may have been
influenced by the implementation of similar statute-based state-level
programs. Through this
investigation, three voids in the wetland management literature
have been addressed. First, a case for Wetland Regulatory Units
has been described for the first time as real and consequential
components of the regulatory landscape.
Second, relationships between the outcomes of the national
wetland regulatory program and local socioeconomic and landscape
conditions such as population size, growth rates, income, wetland
abundance, and program funding levels are quantified. Finally, a model describing the amount of wetland
fill permitted and the number of permits issued by the national
government is constructed from these relationships. The accomplishment of these tasks produces several new evaluative
tools and insights that may be used by state and national government
wetland managers to more efficiently and effectively implement
their programs. |
| |
| The
results reveal that some, but not all measures of the national
wetland regulatory program's outcomes are influenced by state
programs. There is no
evidence that the amount of wetland fill permitted by the national
government differs measurably in accordance with the presence
of any type of active state wetland regulatory program.
Strong evidence exists, however, that the number of permits
issued is directly related to the presence of statute-based
state programs. Furthermore,
these same programs exhibit similar relationships to the national
program as do state programs that are empowered mainly through
their Section 401 authorities.
|
| |
| Therefore,
when it comes to wetland regulation, the traditional assumptions
of American federalism are inadequate. The United States does, indeed still have two
different levels of government operating within the same physical
jurisdictions, however, their programs are quite capable of
exhibiting measurable influence upon one another. |
| |
EXPANDING
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY DATA TO PREDICT WETLAND FUNCTIONS
FOR WATERSHEDS
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Ralph W. Tiner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Northeast Region
300 Westgate Center Drive
Hadley, MA 01035
ralph_tiner@fws.gov
|
| |
| The
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) Program has produced wetland maps since the mid-1970s. Map data have been converted to digital data
for over 50% of the country.
The availability of this and other geospatial data (e.g.,
stream, soils, and topography) make it possible to expand the
NWI data to include landscape-level properties that significantly
increase the functionality of the NWI database. Four main features that can be added to the
maps are: 1) landscape position (the relationship between a
wetland and an adjacent waterbody if present), 2) landform (the
shape or form of a wetland), 3) water flow path (the directional
flow of water in a wetland), and 4) waterbody type (more specific
classification of ponds, lakes, rivers, streams, and estuaries).
When combined with the existing NWI characteristics (ecological
system, subsystem, class/subclass, water regime, and other modifiers),
the NWI database becomes a powerful analytical tool that can
be used to better characterize wetlands (e.g., how many palustrine
wetlands are associated with rivers or streams; how many are
geographically isolated?), to predict wetland functions for
watersheds, and produce maps and statistics for watershed assessments.
To date, correlations between the enhanced NWI data and
10 functions have been developed: 1) surface water detention,
2) streamflow maintenance, 3) nutrient transformation, 4) coastal
storm surge detention, 5) sediment and other particulate retention,
6) shoreline stabilization, 7) provision of fish and shellfish
habitat, 8) provision of waterfowl and waterbird habitat, 9)
provision of other wildlife habitat, and 10) conservation of
biodiversity. Application of the enhanced NWI database for
predicting wetland functions will be demonstrated and comparisons
made between selected watersheds in the Northeast. |
| |
AN
INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MONITORING AND PREDICTING PHRAGMITES
AUSTRALIS IN A MANAGED SOUTH CAROLINA ESTUARY
|
| |
|
Presenter*/Authors:
Samuel P. Walker* and Dwayne E. Porter
Department of Environmental Health Sciences
Arnold School of Public Health
University of South Carolina
921 Assembly Street, PHRC
401 Columbia, SC 29208
(803) 777 3978
|
| |
| Increasing
concern over the effect of non-native and invasive plant species
on the estuarine resources of the United States has prompted
recent efforts to effectively quantify and monitor these species.
The advantages of using remote sensing technology to address
this issue are numerous, and this investigation seeks to further
establish the benefits that image processing, as part of an
integrated modeling approach, can provide to coastal resource
managers. Due to the expansive coastal environments that exist
in the southeastern United States, the estuaries there represent
ideal sites to further these research efforts. Although the common reed (Phragmites australis)
is considered one of the most aggressive species currently encroaching
upon coastal ecosystems, questions remain regarding the ultimate
benefits and detriments of this species. The study seeks to
contribute to that discussion by providing new scientific data
through an integrated approach that combines in situ
sampling, remote sensing, geographic information processing,
predictive modeling, and statistical analyses. This investigation
is comprised of three principal elements; 1) the evaluation
of specific remote sensing datasets in the identification and
mapping of Phragmites; 2) the development and testing
of a spatial-temporal model for predicting the establishment
of Phragmites in a managed National Estuarine Research
Reserve (NERR) and; 3) an examination of the most effective
methods for implementing these techniques within the existing
structure and management practices of a NERR.
This presentation will highlight the experimental design,
image processing techniques, modeling results, and benefits
of the study. |
| |
| IKeywords:
Phragmites, Remote Sensing, Modeling, Estuaries |
| |
STREAM
RESTORATION POLICY IN THE OUTER COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh, NC
john.dorney@ncmail.net
and
Tom Walker*
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville, NC
|
| |
| Stream
mitigation has traditionally involved restoration of stable
dimension, pattern and profile in order to address streambank
stability issues as well as habitat restoration through planting
of wooded buffers and construction of hard structures. However
in the outer coastal plain, streambank stability is a less important
issue due to much gentler slopes and less erosive velocities.
Additionally, wetlands are almost always present adjacent
to stream channels and in small watersheds, surface flow tends
to be as much diffuse flow as channel flow.
In order to reflect these unique characteristics of outer
coastal plain streams, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NC
Division of Water Quality developed and implemented a new guidance
document with the assistance of a variety of stakeholders. This
guidance (now in its second version) allows stream mitigation
credits on headwater, coastal plain streams by filling in existing
ditches and planting adjacent wooded buffers without the extensive
earth moving needed to create stream sinuocity.
Success criteria include evidence of surface flow, establishment
of adjacent wetlands, restoration of an aquatic community and
tree growth all with respect to reference conditions.
This guidance has been used by several public and private
mitigation providers in the outer Coastal Plain over the past
several years. Examples
of restoration done under this guidance will be discussed. |
| |
GEO-ENABLED
SEA LEVEL RISE MODEL
|
| |
|
Presenters*/Authors:
Bill O. Wilen Ph.D
National Wetlands Inventory
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 400
Arlington, VA 22203
(703)-358-2278; Bill_Wilen@fws.gov
|
| |
| The
Sea level Affecting Marsh Model (SLAMM) simulates the dominant
processes involved in wetland conversions and shoreline modifications
during long-term sea level rise. A complex decision tree incorporating geometric
and qualitative relationships is used to represent transfers
among coastal classes. Each
site is divided into cells of equal area, and each class within
a cell is simulated separately.
Map distributions of wetlands are predicted under conditions
of accelerated sea level rise, and results are summarized in
tabular and graphical form. |
| |
| There
are four primary processes modeled within SLAMM that affect
wetland fate under different scenarios of sea level rise: inundation, erosion, overwash, and saturation.
To account for inundation, the rise of water levels and
the salt boundary is tracked by reducing elevations of each
cell as sea levels rise. Erosion is triggered based on a threshold
of maximum fetch and the proximity of the wetland to estuarine
water or open ocean. Overwash
of barrier islands of under 500 meter width are assumed during
each 25 year time-step due to storms encountered.
Beach migration and transport of sediments are calculated.
Saturation occurs as a response of the water table to
a rising sea level and coastal forested wetlands and fresh marshes
migrate onto adjacent uplands close to the coast. |
| |
| All
the digital data needed to run SLAMM can be downloaded from
the web. NOAA tidal data are first used to first set up 30 meter
by 30 meter cells in which to run the model.
SLAMM uses National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetland
classification categories to form the basis of the model, converted
into SLAMM categories. NWI categories are also used to refine
elevation estimates for each cell. Data on dikes, available as an NWI data attribute,
show whether each cell is protected by dikes or not. Digital elevation map (DEM) data (meters) are
used to calculate partial changes in cell composition as the
sea level rises. |
| |
POLICING
THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN LAW AND POLICY IN THE SECTION 404 PROGRAM
|
| |
|
Presenter/Author:
Doug Williams
Professor of Law
Saint Louis University School of Law
(314) 977-2786; williaj2@slu.edu
|
| |
| Over
the years, the courts have struggled to mark the boundaries
of regulatory authority under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act. The principal areas
in which the boundary problem rages are well known and continuing. The Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos did little, if anything, to clarify
Section 404’s key jurisdictional term, “navigable waters.” More recently, in National Association of Home Builders v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
the District Court for the District of Columbia enjoined enforcement
of the “Tulloch II” rule, which defined the statutory
term “discharge of dredged material” to include most “use[s]
of mechanized earth-moving equipment to conduct landclearing,
ditching, channelization, in-stream mining or other earth-moving
activity in the waters of the United States.” |
| |
| Court
decisions involving Section 404 exhibit significant confusion
and disagreement within the judiciary about whether formal or
functional considerations should predominate in discerning the
boundaries of regulatory authority.
The tools of the formal approach are dictionaries and
other general legal aids to discerning statutory meaning.
The formal approach emphasizes the courts’ responsibility
to “contain” regulatory authority within a boundary of law.
The primary tools of the functional approach, by contrast,
are general policies, science, and more specific empirical considerations.
The functional approach emphasizes agency expertise and
the limited role of the courts in the implementation of complex
regulatory programs and policies. The tension between formal and functional approaches
roughly parallels the tension between law and policy. |
| |
| This
paper will review the trajectory of formal and functional considerations
in the cases with particular emphasis on the evolution of the
Tulloch rule. It will
suggest that the decision in National
Association of Home Builders swings too much toward formalism, brushing a very thin veneer of law over complex
policy choices that are neither foreclosed nor mandated by the
terms of Section 404. The
paper will make suggestions about how functional considerations
may properly be accorded significant weight by the courts.
|
| |
| The
argument presented in the paper has ramifications beyond the
discrete boundary problems involved in Rapanos and National Association of Home Builders. The argument is an important
step toward recognizing the appropriateness, and legality, of
“watershed-wide strategies to maximize wetland ecological and
social services.” |
| |
| Go
to: Abstracts
Page 1; Abstracts
Page 2 |
| Return
to Agenda |
|