View from the blog-o-sphereGreen growth: an operational tool (and GDP has had its day…) 

By Carlo Carraro – International Center for Climate Governance – September 3, 2014
Let’s imagine a geography map. Let’s imagine a brown marker placed at one point on the map (the starting point) and a green marker (the arrival point) placed at a different point. The brown marker is brown economy, today’s economy, largely based on the use of fossil fuels and no longer sustainable for the planet and ourselves. The green marker is the point we need to get to, green economy, an economic system where well-being and social equity progress while environmental risks are reduced and the limits to natural resources are managed more sensibly: a low-carbon economy, whose key factors are social inclusivity and high efficiency in the use of resources. For full blog post, click here.

Posted in green economy | Leave a comment

Salameanderby Peg Bostwick, ASWM

I’m one of those people who have been following climate change issues and science seriously for about a decade.  Not as a researcher, and it is not my primary occupation, but I’ve been paying attention.  ped1002141And it seems to me that this year we have turned some sort of corner in terms of public perception.  There seem to be many fewer news reports and articles asking whether climate change is real, and whether there is a human cause.  In their place are many more reporting on the impacts of climate change, both current and future, and our needed response.

Even more encouraging – the business community appears to be taking a serious look at the reality of climate change, and the long term economic risk that it poses.  Following the drinking water crisis in Toledo arising from Lake Erie algal blooms and other reports on algal blooms and dead zones in areas across the nation, some companies spoke publicly of changes in business practices based on the recognition that addressing climate change will be less expensive in the long run than ignoring it.   Forbes has posted articles on climate change pointing out the potential risk of climate change to the global economy, albeit counterpointed by those that remain skeptical of scientific reports.

Yes, there are still many skeptics – denial that may arise from fear or belief or in some cases short term self- interest.  But once we, as a society, generally understand and accept the massive challenge presented by climate change and the urgency of addressing it, then we can focus more fully on identifying and setting priorities for solutions, and on taking action. This is true in terms of cutting emissions and for climate adaptation.  We can move ahead with less resistance.

Business interests are reaching out in reports like Risky Business – the Economic Risks of Climate Change in the United States – prepared by a group co-chaired by former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg.  This report lays out, in a compelling and very graphic manner what may be anticipated in the future both with and without action to mitigate climate change.



I also suggest that you read (or re-read) a blog from one of ASWM’s supporters, the McKnight Foundation, which has  previously been posted on the ASWM web pages.  Aimee Witteman speaks of her return to the midwest, and the actions taken by her new home state, Minnesota, to address climate change.  Her post also references the recently released report by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board – Minnesota & Climate Change: Our Tomorrow Starts Today.  Minnesota is one of the leaders, but not alone in progressive action at the state level by forward looking agencies and organizations. A number of states are addressing climate change in an integrated manner, using the best current science available.

From the perspective of wetland managers, I hope that growing public understanding and acceptance of climate challenges helps to re-energize public commitment to protection of our natural resources.  As the public comes to understand that not only polar bears but water resources are at risk, then support for effective management of water should grow.  More than ever, we need to erase the lines that divide those who protect habitat and those who manage or protect water for human use; between those who use land for housing, agriculture, or an array of other purposes, and those who plan land use to sustain multiple resource values.  Between those who think in economic terms, and those who think in ecological terms.

Agencies, organizations, businesses and individuals who have a vested interest in water resources – and isn’t that just about all of us? – need to be on the same page.  At one time, the environment was not a partisan issue.  I sincerely hope that we return to that perspective as we confront climate change and its risks, together.

Read more:

An article on the economic risk of climate change on the Forbes site, here.

Check out the website for Risky Business here.

Read Minnesota & Climate Change: Our Tomorrow Starts Today, here.

Read Aimee Whittman’s blog on the McKnight Foundation website, here.

Posted in climate change | Tagged | Leave a comment

View from the blog-o-sphereKarl Brooks: Comment on water rules 

By Karl Brooks – The Wichita Eagle – September 22, 2014
When Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972, it didn’t just defend the mighty Mississippi or Missouri rivers from pollution. It also protected our smaller streams and wetlands that flow into rivers such as the Arkansas, Kaw, Ninnescah, Smoky Hill and Neosho in Kansas. Streams and wetlands are crucial for fishing, hunting, tourism, agriculture, recreation, energy and businesses. Under the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a draft proposal in March that strengthens protection for clean water. Science shows us what kinds of streams and wetlands affect water downstream – so our proposal says that these waters should be protected. For full blog post, click here.


Posted in Clean Water Act, streams, wetlands | Leave a comment

Wetlander's Pick of the PostsDrought Journal: Hope springs eternal

By Peter Moyle and Rebecca M. Quiñones – California WaterBlog – September 21 201
In a severe drought, a cold, free-flowing stream is a marvel. This past summer, we traveled around Northern California looking for such streams. Our guide was field notes from UC Davis fish-sampling trips 10 to 30 years ago, which tell us where the best places should be. We were often discouraged, finding dry stream beds or just a few stagnant pools. But we also found a few streams that persisted no matter the drought. These are spring-fed streams, and it was stunning to see them in the dry landscapes we visited. Many clearly are refuges for native fishes. For full blog post, click here.

Posted in drought, streams | Leave a comment

by Brenda Zollitsch


A recent trip to Mt. Agamenticus in  Southern Maine was a lesson for even this highly optimistic wetland enthusiast.  I would never have thought my children (a seven-year-old son and three-year-old daughter) would understand, let alone get excited about, vernal pools.  I was wrong.   Our hike in vernal1brendaMaine demonstrated the power of quality education and outreach tools to convey complex scientific topics and garner unexpected enthusiasm for creatures that don’t fit into the coveted category of “charismatic mega-fauna.” 

Earlier this year, ASWM hosted (and I was lucky enough to get to moderate) an international webinar on wetland centers.  The webinar was put on by Wetland Link International (WLI) and brought speakers together from three countries to discuss best practices for developing high quality wetland centers.  Their recently published handbook  is a great tool for those thinking about how to connect the public with wetlands and deliver different types of educational tools, while also protecting the wetland environment, wetland functions and remaining financially viable as a nonprofit enterprise.

vernal2brendaOur way up the mountain was focused on the activity of hiking, the blowing leaves, the snack and the water breaks.  At the top, we looked out upon a vista that included the White Mountains, coastal Maine and Boston.  Very impressive! We were a little sun-baked, we decided to quickly check out the nature center at the top.  It was small and, as vernal3brendaparents, our expectations were low.  After climbing some dimly lit stairs, we entered an engaging interpretive environment.  My son ran his hands over a raised topographic map, he became engrossed by an array of animal droppings that had been petrified and put on display.  Both picked up plaster molds of animal paw prints and oooohed and aaaaahed over a coveted garter snake skin.

An interpretive guide came over and got down on her knees and asked them if they had any questions.  Rather than a lame obligatory question or perhaps even dreaded sullen silence, both kids were bubbling over with questions.  What kind of snake used to live in this skin?  Do they live here on the mountain?  Could they see one?  What about that pelt?  What kind of animal vernal4brenda23had that fur?  The delighted guide was kind and answered all their questions.  She even encouraged them to sign in their observations in a notebook at the top.  They ran over and in scrawled writing (befitting interpretation with a Rosetta stone) my son’s snake siting was documented for all time.  She congratulated them on contributing to scientific documentation.  They were bursting with pride.

We then moved over to a series of interpretive signs.  Basically, the signs talked about a special kind of pool that is only filled vernal5brendawith water part of the year.  These pools are used by amphibians (frogs and salamanders) to lay their eggs.  They are very important to helping them live and have babies.  They are called “vernal pools.”  Mt. Agementicus is home to the largest number of vernal pools in the state.  Honestly, even though I am a wetland professional, I had not known of the area’s claim to wetland fame as  vernal pool heaven.  After reading more about them, the kids cheered “I want to see one!  Show us!”  I reminded them that they were mostly dry now and that the only way we would see salamanders would be to look under logs.

vernal0They were undaunted. The easy way down the mountain would have been the roadway, but no way was my son going to miss out on his vernal pool treasure hunt.  So for the next 45 minutes, thanks to the great interpretive signage and a superbly inspiring guide, we looked under logs for salamanders, we spotted dried up vernal pools, and we talked about what amphibians are and their life cycles.  We never found a single salamander, but thanks to understanding what he was looking for, we found several mostly dry vernal pools – muddy indentations on the landscape that we had passed by unknowingly and decidedly uncaringly just an hour before.

vernal7brendaI am not sure that I would have made a focused effort to teach my kids about the specifics of vernal pools at the ages of seven and three.  In my own mind, the concept of a vernal pool is complex and efforts to protect them complicated.  But thanks to the right combination of information and delivery, I was entirely wrong about that.  We sometimes get so caught up in the science and technology, the terminology and the complexity of the regulatory systems we are trying to manage that we forget that getting someone to care isn’t always an impossibility.  I would never in a million years have thought I’d hear:  “Mom, take a picture of me with this vernal pool!”   Someone else believed that the message could be heard.  And I am grateful they did.

For more information, I encourage you to:

Watch this informative series of videos about vernal pools

Check out what researchers are finding about vernal pools in Maine

Learn how regulators in your state are working to protect State vernal pools –FAQs on Maine’s regulations – and  links to vernal pool pages in New England

If you are in the northeast, explore vernal pools using these Indicator Species Identification Cards

If you are a teacher, learn what resources are available in your region.  In California, the environmental nonprofit organization Splash provides a full vernal pool educational curriculum

Find out about the Mt. Agamenticus Conservation Region, conservation activities and trail system

Read children a wonderful story about the wildlife on Mt. Agamenticus both in the day and at night, called Forest Bright, Forest Night

Posted in education, Environmental Education, outreach, recreation, Vernal Pools, wetlands | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

View from the blog-o-sphereConservation Groups, Farmers Protect & Restore Precious Puget Sound Estuary

By Kirk Hanlin – USDA Blog – September , 2014
When many people think of Washington State, they imagine rain, coffee and apples. My view is much more complex and nuanced, thanks to our team at NRCS who showed me diverse agricultural landscapes, including the state’s major estuary – Puget Sound. During my visit, I was greeted by an idyllic landscape steeped in history. Early settlers to the Puget Sound area converted marshlands into pastures and hayfields. We visited one such area now known as Klingel Wetlands, where levee systems were installed in the 1890s and 1950s to prevent flooding. For full blog post, click here.

Posted in wetlands | Leave a comment

Wetlander's Pick of the PostsNew framework for trading wetlands urged

Agri News – September 22 201
If Faust had been in the business of trading wetlands rather than selling his soul, the devil might be portrayed by the current guidelines for wetland restoration. Research from the University of Illinois recommends a new framework that could make Faustian bargains over wetland restoration sites result in more environmentally positive outcomes. For full story, click here.

Posted in wetlands | Leave a comment

By Marla J. Stelk, Policy Analyst, ASWM

One of the lessons we have learned at the Association of State Wetland Managers (ASWM) over the years(and one that we have been particularly reminded of over the last year), is the importance of using an agreed upon lexicon when trying to communicate science within the context of public policy, law 91814m11and stakeholder engagement. Indeed, each of those three areas (policy, law and engagement) will typically interpret the meaning of words differently. For example, in conducting interviews with states in regard to how they define streams, we discovereddifferent meanings for the word “ephemeral” depending on where one lives in the country. In fact, in some states, the term “intermittent” may include streams that are sometimes scientifically classified as “ephemeral.” And one only has to look at the flurry of debate going on in regard to the new Proposed Rule for the Clean Water Act to understand how difficult it can be to create definitions for words that describe natural phenomenon such as what types of waters are protected by it or what constitutes “connectivity.” Nature is messy and hard to define.

Recently, ASWM convened an interdisciplinary work group to tackle the challenge of improving wetland restoration success. The word “success” was the group’s first hurdle to overcome. What is “success” – what does it look like and how is it measured? Joy Zedler prefers not to use that word at all – she believes it is entirely too subjective and that scientists should measure quantifiable metrics such as soil hydrology and water  91814m22chemistry. They should measure progress toward reaching a  specific goal. “Success,” on the other hand, is in the eye of the beholder. Others in the work group, such as Robin Lewis, point out that the word is used regardless of its subjectivity. Since often funders of restoration want to show “success,” we have no choice but to use it, though it must be couched within observable or measurable performance standards. Similarly, the word “value” can mean very different things depending on the context in which it is used (e.g., economics, science, religion, etc.).

When our restoration work group put together its first lexicon glossary to assist with discussions and for the development of a future white paper, the variety of meanings for different words wasremarkable. For example, consider the word “resilience”:

1) Engineers define resilience in terms of structural performance, efficiency, constancy, and predictability, and measure resilience in terms of the ability for a system to return to a steady, functioning state after a disturbance (Schultz et al., 2012),

2) Ecologists on the other hand, who recognize the inherent adaptive nature of systems, and focus on ecosystem response to perturbations, measure resilience in terms of resistance (the system’s ability to maintain a particular trajectory in spite of stress), and dynamic equilibrium (the ability to recover or regain functionality and structural integrity once a disturbance has passed) (Society for Ecological Restoration International (SERI), 2004);

3) Whereas sociologists come at the problem from a human perspective, focusing on a community’s ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from and more successfully adapt to adverse events (National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 2012).

In the context of any discussion about resiliency, it is necessary to clarify which definition of resiliency is being used.

91814m33The English language is dynamic. So is our understanding of the world around us. It follows that meanings of words change as our understanding of the world around us expands. Many words acquire new meanings when used in political and policy discussions (e.g. “sustainability”, “natural”). Often words with a history of common usage in the English language can end up with new scientific meanings such as “function.”Developing a glossary or common lexicon at the beginning of any in-depth discussion can avoid misunderstandings and set rational expectations. It is similar to what I do whenever I facilitate break-out groups. I start by developing a list of ground rules so that folks have a chance to agree on what is acceptable during discussion or not. For example, a popular one is “don’t talk over other people – wait for your turn.”

Similarly, in order to successfully communicate within diverse audiences, we must first provide a glossary to define our lexicon to ensure that everyone is on the same page. In fact, when communicating with audiences from different 91814m44backgrounds, it is a good idea to start by learning their lexicon. It’s not so different from traveling abroad. If you don’t know the  language, most folks bring a translation dictionary with them so they can try to communicate with the native tongue. And for Peat’s Sake – in a world where “LOL” can actually end up in the Webster’s Dictionary, we must be vigilant in our attempts to continue the art of two-way dialogues that use actual words and avoid acronyms. Is a rose a rose? With all due respect to Gertrude Stein, it depends on who defines it. Developing acommon lexicon is an excellent way to start.

Posted in Communication, restoration, wetlands | Tagged | Leave a comment

View from the blog-o-sphereIt’s Settled: No Country Does Water Management Better Than the Netherlands 

By Rachel Keeton – Next City – September 10, 2014
Over the past year, this column has looked at more than 25 different projects around the Netherlands that are intended to increase this country’s resiliency, particularly in regards to climate change. These projects have ranged from sustainable citywide heating systems to outlawing antibiotics for livestock, and there are new projects gaining traction every day. In the Netherlands, these projects are evidence of a clear commitment to both adaptation and advance planning. For full story, click here.

Posted in floodplains, water | Leave a comment

Wetlander's Pick of the PostsPlaying Politics with Clean Water

By S. Chris Hunt – Hatch Magazine – September 16, 2014
Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to undermine the efforts of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers as the two federal agencies seek to clarify which waters should be protected under the Clean Water Act and which waters should not be regulated. For full article, click here.

Posted in Clean Water Act | Leave a comment